Posted November 20, 2008 4:59 PM by Tristan Roberts
Related Categories: Behind the Scenes

Posted from Greenbuild '08.

A month ago, EBN was the first to report the news that the ASHRAE Standard 189-P committee, which has been developing the nation's first code-level national green building standard for commercial buildings, had been unexpectedly disbanded by ASHRAE.

At a special Greenbuild update today, Mark MacCracken, a USGBC representative to the committee, referred to reports of the committee's disbanding as "rumors." Come again? He later acknowledged that the committee had been, in official terminology, "cleared," and that "this probably wasn't handled as well as it could have been, in terms of communication." MacCracken also publicly confirmed what we had suspected: that due to stakeholders feeling left out of the committee, the standard was in danger of being appealed to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) on procedural grounds, which would have bogged it down considerably.

In response, ASHRAE cleared the committee and is now accepting applications as it reconvenes it. According to MacCracken, the committee is expected to expand from 23 to 30 members. (The former committee chair, John Hogan, about whom MacCracken spoke in glowing terms, resisted ASHRAE's moves, and ultimately resigned, according to our sources, in part because an expanded committee would potentially be unwieldy. Kent Peterson will be the new chair, said MacCracken.)

The new committee is expected to be reformed and in operation by December 15th, with a goal of completing its work in 2009, following a third public review. It will start its work with the draft that passed through the second public review, including some subsequent revisions. USGBC has recommitted its support, along with IES, the other partner.

Our headline from a month ago read "Uncertain Future for ASHRAE 189." Was that ever true? Is it still? I would say "yes" on both accounts. Process-wise, it looks like it will go ahead, which wasn't so certain a month ago when ASHRAE surprised everyone with this move. What about the content? Some of the targets, such as a baseline 30% energy savings, are quite aggressive for a minimum code-enforceable standard, and a variety of powerful players have lined up against the standard. Those players will now have the chance to get a seat at the table, and a vote.

Interestingly, USGBC CEO Rick Fedrizzi announced at last year's Greenbuild that if 189 is passed, the most basic "certified" level of LEED may be phased out. That's presumably because 189 is based on that level of LEED, and USGBC would be advocating for compliance with 189 as a basic requirement for all U.S. buildings.

Comments (1) | Send | | 2195 Views

Related Blog Entries

Comments

Nice report. I'm not used to having each word of what I say so scrutinized. Good point on ”rumors.” On the “cleared” I should have said “re-constituted.” And as far as how it was handled, the words I used - “ this probably” - should have been left out. It wasn’t handled well. And because of how it was handled, certain procedures concerning working with partners on standards will be re-evaluated.

Sincerely,
Mark M MacCracken, PE, Pte, LEED-AP
CEO
CALMAC Mfg. Corp.
Posted 11/25/08 9:23 AM by Mark MacCracken
Get new posts via e-mail:


Recent Comments

People Like Urine-Separating Toilets

ted hettick says, “I like the illustration, too!” More...


Alex's Cool Product of the Week: Zehnder’s High-Efficiency HRV Systems

Buzz says, “Every aspect of this system is long overdue and sounds terrific. Except of course, for the price. ...” More...


LEED AP Credential Maintenance: Cracking the Code

Mara Baum says, “I suspect that many people will need to weigh the pros and cons of "opting in" in terms of...” More...


Green Building Myth #3: Green Products Don’t Work as Well as Standard Products

Bill Swanson says, “CFL's put LESS mercury into the environment then typical incandescent lamps. By a 1:2 ratio per the...” More...

Tony Marshallsay says, “CFLs are still an ecological disaster: non-recyclable; contain poisonous mercury; far more embodied ...” More...



Follow BuildingGreen
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Linkedin