|
|
Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, swings and swings and swings and misses the point entirely. As do most of the comments — over 2,200 of them so far. So much darkness.
Recent Comments
Counting Carbon... Wrong? Brian Kaplan says, “Nicely said David. I wonder what a graphic on alternative building materials would look like... St...” More... Heating with magazines Mark says, “Check out the under-the-fold page-one story in The Commons http://www.commonsnews.org/site/assets/PD...” More... LEED 2009 is an action hero — and open for public comment david kurland says, “We are herein to be focused on LEED credits. Here we have the benefit of an English lesson too; whic...” More... Headlines from the year 2020 Jinjee says, “OK, maybe these are more like the year 2130..... 1. Oceans - People dancing in oceans en masse, j...” More... LEED AP Practice Exam Nav says, “EQ Credit 2, Increased Ventilation, requires 30% increased ventilation above the minimum required ra...” More... Archives by Category
AIA Convention '08 (12) [RSS]
Authors (13) [RSS] Awards (2) [RSS] Behind the Scenes (38) [RSS] Books & Media (31) [RSS] Build Boston '07 (2) [RSS] BuildingEnergy '08 (2) [RSS] Case Studies (5) [RSS] Events (60) [RSS] Google Earth/Sketchup (2) [RSS] Greenbuild '07 (30) [RSS] Greenbuild '08 (1) [RSS] LEED (25) [RSS] Living Futures (2) [RSS] Miscellania (18) [RSS] Nature & Nurture (35) [RSS] Op-Ed (26) [RSS] Politics (11) [RSS] Product Talk (49) [RSS] Q&A (5) [RSS] Science & Tech (22) [RSS] The Industry (49) [RSS] Editorial Radar
|
My concern is not that this is a congressional/EPA mandate, as the senator pleads, but that there is indeed an inherent toxicity to these 'green' lightbulbs. I have also read the instructions for cleaning up one of these light bulbs, and it is unlikely that anyone will follow that procedure. I have stated my concerns elsewhere, and one response indicated that the amount of mercury was some small fraction of allowable exposure, and/or is dwarfed by other common sources of emission. The number of bulbs in use must already be in the hundreds of millions. There will be very few people who dispose of them properly, and the cumulative effect may be significant to some degree. On balance, this may be comparably inconsequential, but there is just something about this that bothers me. It just seems that these products aren't in themselves 'green' and their value seems to be measure solely in reduced energy consumption.