×

Error message

  • The specified file temporary://fileKmIaIf could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://filelXRggT could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://fileZRwAuI could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://fileKnCqlk could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://filePW6Q2J could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.

News Brief

Study Finds Quick Payback for LEED Investments

Managing principal George Nasis, AIA, and director of environmental research Bryna Dunn, Assoc. AIA, both of Moseley Architects in Richmond, Virginia, studied three of the firm’s LEED-certified institutional buildings and found paybacks for green features of under four years based on energy savings alone. Nasis and Dunn monitored energy use in the buildings and compared it to the energy use of a baseline building meeting minimum ASHRAE 90.1 requirements. Using the firm’s average LEED premium of 1.5% for design and construction costs, they calculated simple payback figures of 1.7 years, 2.7 years, and 3.9 years (see table). According to Dunn, calculating the baseline figures was far from easy, especially for the renovation and expansion of a recreation building at William and Mary College, which had been built to earlier codes with different requirements for ventilation, lighting, and other energy-using features.

Source: George Nasis and Bryna Dunn, Moseley Architects

Managing principal George Nasis, AIA, and director of environmental research Bryna Dunn, Assoc. AIA, both of Moseley Architects in Richmond, Virginia, studied three of the firm’s LEED-certified institutional buildings and found paybacks for green features of under four years based on energy savings alone. Nasis and Dunn monitored energy use in the buildings and compared it to the energy use of a baseline building meeting minimum ASHRAE 90.1 requirements. Using the firm’s average LEED premium of 1.5% for design and construction costs, they calculated simple payback figures of 1.7 years, 2.7 years, and 3.9 years (see table). According to Dunn, calculating the baseline figures was far from easy, especially for the renovation and expansion of a recreation building at William and Mary College, which had been built to earlier codes with different requirements for ventilation, lighting, and other energy-using features.

 

Published October 29, 2008

Wendt, A. (2008, October 29). Study Finds Quick Payback for LEED Investments. Retrieved from https://www.buildinggreen.com/newsbrief/study-finds-quick-payback-leed-investments

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a BuildingGreen Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.