I live this article, though not much of the info here is actually new. I covered most of this stuff when freelancing in the US from 2004-2008. Nonetheless, it remains useful. I wonder, though, how much of this applies to really retrofitting. For example, in Chicago I lived in pre-War apartments where I imagine increasing insulation wouldn't exactly be easy. Even if it could be blown in, wouldn't it create a terrific mess? Please understand I'm not denigrating your column; I'm praising it; but I would love a little edification.
Blog Post
Green Building Priority #9 – Create Resilient Houses
Number 9 in my list of the top-10 green building priorities is to create resilient houses that will protect occupants in a changing climate or during extended power outages, loss of heating fuel, or water shortages. Climate change is underway, and some of the impacts of that change will affect our homes. We need to account for that in the design, construction, and remodeling of our homes. For starters, we should plan for hotter temperatures. To limit unwanted solar gain, it makes sense to reduce square-footage of west- and east-facing windows, provide overhangs above south-facing windows, and landscape around our homes with plantings that block direct sun. We should increase insulation levels to slow heat flow through the envelope, provide reflective roofing, and design our homes to make effective use of natural ventilation. More intense storms call for greater resistance to wind and rain penetration, use of hurricane straps and other structural features to prevent uplift, more durable roofing, and building geometries that are inherently resistant to wind. We should design to the most stringent building codes, such as the Miami-Dade County Hurricane Code, even in areas where hurricanes are rare. We should build only in locations that are well above flood elevations, avoiding lowland areas. If FEMA flood-elevation maps haven't been updated recently, we should go beyond those requirements. Our stormwater drainage systems, including storm sewers, should be designed and built to handle increased runoff flow. Heavy winds, ice storms, flooding, heat stress, drought, and other impacts of climate change are likely to cause more frequent and more extended power outages and damage to refineries. Extended drought could cause power outages if water levels in rivers and lakes drop so low that thermoelectric power plants cannot be cooled, and therefore have to be shut down. A new, and perhaps even more frightening, concern is that terrorists of the future might target our energy systems--including electrical distribution lines, oil and gas pipelines, refineries, and power plants--causing extended blackouts or loss of heating fuels. A past director of the CIA, James Wolsey, has raised serious concerns about "cyber-terrorism," in which people hack into our power generation and distribution infrastructure and cause system failures. Converting to the widely touted "smart grid" could unfortunately increase this vulnerability, even while it offers many advantages. These concerns call for passive survivability as a design criterion. This means creating homes that will maintain livable conditions even during extended loss of power, loss of heating fuel, or shortages of water. To achieve passive survivability involves creating extremely well-insulated homes--homes so well insulated that without any energy inputs they will never drop below 50 or 55 degrees in the winter. Achieving passive survivability requires extremely high insulation levels--in colder climates, this means walls over R-40, ceilings or roofs over R-50, triple-glazed windows with multiple low-e coatings, very tight construction (augmented by mechanical ventilation), and passive solar gain through south-facing windows. In warmer climates, we can see some of the features of passive survivability by examining the "vernacular architecture" that existed before 1950--when air conditioning emerged. Traditional homes in New Orleans had wrap-around porches to keep direct sunlight out and provide outdoor living space in hot weather, and they were designed for natural ventilation. We need to return to this climate-appropriate architecture--but we can give it a modern twist with the benefits of today's best materials and computer modeling of energy performance. In some parts of the country, droughts of the future may severely limit water availability. Significantly more water-efficient plumbing fixtures and appliances and water-conserving landscaping practices, if adopted widely, will reduce the likelihood that our water supplies become inadequate. And such measures will help individuals get by if water rationing ever becomes necessary during severe droughts or water shortages. Homeowners and municipalities in the West sometimes think about these issues, but drought can also occur in the east, where water is rarely on our minds. Eastern reservoirs tend to be shallower and hold less water than those in the west. In 2007, Atlanta came to within 30 days of running out of water. Many of these elements of resilient design or adaptation to climate change are features that we would want to include in green homes for other reasons--and which will be addressed elsewhere in this top-10 list. But the motivation behind resilient/adaptive design is an important life-safety issue: keeping homeowners safe in the event of natural or man-made disasters.
In addition to this Energy Solutions blog, Alex writes the weekly blog on BuildingGreen.com: Alex's Cool Product of the Week, which profiles an interesting new green building product each week. You can sign up to receive notices of these blogs by e-mail--enter your e-mail address in the upper right corner of any blog page. Alex is founder of BuildingGreen, LLC and executive editor of Environmental Building News. To keep up with his latest articles and musings, you can sign up for his Twitter feed.
Published September 21, 2010 Permalink Citation
(2010, September 21). Green Building Priority #9 – Create Resilient Houses. Retrieved from https://www.buildinggreen.com/news-article/green-building-priority-9-–-create-resilient-houses
Comments
Have you calculated where you
Have you calculated where your dew point is in the wall? That's a lot of floor space to lose too. Holy cow. R-100. I was happy to just add R-5 under the siding at my house.
Very good article. I have bee
Very good article. I have been trying to live the points elaborated here in converting a 1970s home to be better than Net Zero. This point was achieved in 2006 and I did not stop. My targets are R-70 - R-100 ceilings (achieved with R-100 in flat ceilings and R-70 or better in Cathedral), R-60 walls (Achieved in over 40% of walls so far - still doing it step by step). The approach taken has strengthened the walls (lined on the inside with 6 inches of Single Sided SIPs with Poly Isocyanurate). The walls are then finished (I used wood paneling). Walkout Basement walls were lined on the outside with 4 inches of Poly-Iso (R 29 added) plus added inside insulation. The home has gone from using 61,000 BTUs per sq ft in 2001 to being a net generator of 23,000 BTUs per sq ft in 2009. 2010 will be still better - and 2011 even better still. I do have PV on the roof - it powers the car as well as the new (to the home) evaporative cooling. Yesterday I completed the conversion from Gas Water Heating to GE Hybrid Heat Pump (electric) domestic water heating. This new technology will make solar water panels be out of date because they are far more inexpensive, effective, and free of backup requirements. I have converted to electric lawn mower (for the residual lawn which is not veggie garden) and am doing everything possible to get away from Fossil Fuels - or imported (to my site) fuels. I have off grid capability (Battery Backup) but is still grid tied to supply my surplus electricity to the neighborhood. Interior lighting is either Natural (Massive Sun Tunnels) or LED for over 90% of the evening/night lighting.
The home will be on the Denver Tour of Solar Homes - this Saturday - Sept 25th. I will also give a presentation at the Denver Headquarters of Habitat for Humanity on Tuesday Sept 28th - 7:00 PM... under the auspices of the Colorado Renewable Energy Society (CRES)
I disagree with your FEMA com
I disagree with your FEMA comments, I am currently required to build, which I am doing, 19' above mean high tide on Cape Cod which I believe is absurd and with this height, actually will prove to be more dangerous in a storm. I also note homes in Louisiana and Florida somehow get around these type of regulations due to "hardship" causing homeowners in not quite as threatened areas to shoulder the burden.
I'll add, get the federal government out of the business of insuring coastal homes and let the homwowners and private insurance companies shoulder the risks as they see fit.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a BuildingGreen Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.