Blog Post

Our Real-World Flashing Tape Tests Find a Clear Winner

We took the best PSA tapes from our last round of testing and worked them over on rough OSB and window flanges. One tape worked no matter what.

June 10, 2016

Flashing tapes are critical to many if not most wall assemblies that are currently being built. Therefore the durability of these pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) tapes is critical to the durability of those assemblies. So it may come as a surprise that no one really knows how long they last.

That’s why we’ve been field-testing tapes here in Brattleboro, Vermont. (Learn the whole backstory here.) For our latest round of testing, we have been doing what we do best: bending the rules.

We wanted to know what happens if you install these tapes like a lot of people do on real jobsites: around window openings, on a variety of substrates, and in less-than-ideal conditions.

It’s hard to imagine PSA tape conditions tougher than adhering to both rough-side OSB and a window flange (aluminum and PVC). It turns out that only one tape in our testing adhered without fail to everything, even when wetted: ZIP System flashing tape from Huber Engineered Woods.

First, some caveats

We’ll be the first to say that our testing is anecdotal and suggestive—not conclusive. This is not a takedown of any brand of tape, and we don’t have any financial stake or other interest in the outcomes. BuildingGreen is an independent company that does not run advertising from product manufacturers in its publications.

BuildingGreen Services

Did you know Peter Yost is part of BuildingGreen's consulting team? Get his help with your project. Peter is available to provide building science expertise, trainings, public speaking, building investigations, and more. 

Learn more »
  • We are, after all … wingnuts.
  • Sample sizes of two are anecdotal, not statistically significant.
  • Our results are contextual, and we ask that you not generalize them.
  • To date, we have been driven by a sort-of PSA “Holy Grail”: one tape that does everything.
  • Our mission statement: cajole adult supervision. The industry needs to provide data and testing methods that reflect real wall assemblies and real installation conditions.

Bellowing test with pressure pig: Too expensive

We designed this pressure pig in 2014 to mimic the “bellowing” stress that PSA tapes would see at window openings.

(Z)oinks! We realized pretty quickly—even for wingnuts—that we simply don’t have the resources it would take to automate the pressure-pig bellowing test of a whole slew of tapes (see Testing Pressure-Sensitive Tapes: Rounds Two and Three).

We needed to devise a much simpler test that approximated the pressure that tapes might see when half the tape is adhered to the wall and the other half to, say, a window flange.

New test to simulate wind loading of tapes and real-world window condition: flanges

And that is when we came up with this rig.

We did the math, translating the force of the hanging weight into pressure (Pressure = Force ÷ Area). To simulate variable wind pressure, we loaded and unloaded the hanging weight.

Turns out that one-sixth of a pound is about equal to 75 Pascals of wind pressure, so we decided to make the hanging weight one pound (about 450 Pa or something like an 80 mph wind) to “accelerate” the testing.  We wrote up this new WTF “Protocol” to send around to the three primary high-performance PSA tape manufacturers we were testing to see if the protocol passed some kind of muster with them.

Amazingly, it did.

The key to this test rig is the 3/16" metal bar. It distributes the one-pound hanging load of the bottle pretty evenly between both halves of the PSA tape—the half adhered to the rough OSB and half adhered to the window flange (in this case, PVC).

You can download the whole protocol as sent to the PSA tape manufacturers here.

The whole rig

We ultimately tested three high-performance acrylic exterior PSA tapes:

  • ZIP System Flashing tape
  • Pro Clima Tescon Vana
  • SIGA Wigluv

We set up two samples of each per the test conditions described below. Each bottle weight connects to the string loop with a hook so that all the weights can be easily removed/unloaded.

New test conditions

To further stress the tapes and mimic what we thought was real-world stress:

  1. We applied the tapes to the substrates in an unheated workshop in November 2015 (about 40ºF, 40% relative humidity).
  2. We started the test in an unheated workshop that proved too sheltered. So we moved to a shed. Though protected from direct wind, sunlight, and rain, the shed area was fully fluctuating with the outdoors in terms of temperature and relative humidity.
  3. We periodically wetted the test rigs, front and back, to mimic precipitation getting past the cladding to the tape/flange/OSB. This also mimicked wintertime condensation occurring on the back side of the OSB (each test setup has a rout simulating the gap between the window unit and the framed wall).

NOTE: Two samples of each brand of tape were periodically wetted, and two were not. Each tape type was tested on both PVC and aluminum flanges.

Other important test conditions

Here the bottom side of the test setups (representing the front, or cladding side) has been spritzed to simulate water leaking past the cladding.

Other test conditions:

  1. We did not load any tape setups until at least 24 hours after pressure-applying the tape to the substrate.
  2. We pressure-applied each tape according to the manufacturer’s installation instructions.
  3. One manufacturer (Pro Clima) requires that its primer be used when adhering its exterior tape (Tescon Vana) to rough-side OSB, so we followed these instructions.

Results to date

Table 1 shows the results of our testing as of March 28, 2016. To reiterate, our testing is far from statistically significant; the testing is mainly suggestive, and we would like our testing to lead to more rigorous and extensive testing.

All three of these acrylic tapes are aggressive and respond well to tough conditions. But the only tape that adhered without fail (to date)—regardless of wetting and on both aluminum and PVC flanges—is the ZIP System flashing tape from Huber.

This table shows all the conditions and dates of drops. Blank cells indicate that through March 28, 2016, the tape is still adhered to the substrate well enough to support the weight when loaded.

The shed

This shed is leaky (regarding both air and water), with temperature and relative humidity pretty close to that of the true outdoors.

Taking them to the woodshed

Graph 1 shows how all the tapes held until we moved them from the sheltered workshop to the outdoor shed. It shows the temperature in the shed (black line), the % relative humidity (blue line), and the drops (except the latest drop on March 16, 2016 of B3).

These results surprised me; I was convinced that the European “solid” acrylic tapes would perform better in high-moisture conditions, but at least in our limited testing, ZIP System tape did better, at least to date for winter conditions.

In past work adhering Pro Clima Tescon Vana tape with its primer to both rough-side OSB and masonry such as concrete block and brick, the primer and tape could only be separated by essentially ripping apart the substrate of the tape, or both. There was an incredibly strong bond with the primer. Therefore we were surprised that this product did not perform as well in our latest testing. In looking for answers, we think it is possible that when applying the primer to the OSB at 40ºF, we did not allow the primer to “set,” or we applied the primer in too thick a coating to become “tacky” before adhering the tape.

What’s next?

In November 2015, we learned of the Durability Lab run by Building Diagnostics, Inc., affiliated with the JJ Pickle Center at the University of Texas – Austin (http://www.buildingdx.com/services/materials_testing).

Principal David NiCastro, P.E., is field-testing for long-term durability a variety of building assembly components, soon to include PSA tapes. I decided to drop NiCastro a line about our WTF work with PSA tapes with the remote chance that he knew of us and did anything besides roll on the floor laughing at our “work.”

“We have followed your work in this area with admiration, and would be flattered to work with you in the future,” wrote NiCastro in a December 2015 email. What? Admiration and flattery? Wingnut wonders never cease.

Stay tuned as we try to convince NiCastro that WTF should become the “cold-climate partner” for the Durability Lab.

Incidentally, I took the following photo in mid-May 2016. There were only eight test samples still hanging in there. All of them were ZIP tape—wet or dry, and on PVC or aluminum window flanges.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a BuildingGreen Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

Comments

April 1, 2017 - 8:56 pm

It's great to see these types of studies happening.  I'm curious your thoughts on the performance difference from Holladay's article where he said the "zip system tape did not perform well on OSB."  Different testing protocol for sure but you would think there would be some congruity in results to a degree.  Thanks!