News Brief

Thermal Bridging Can Degrade Wall Performance 70%

The Devil is in your details, and he’s letting staggering amounts of energy escape.

Impact of Interface Details on R-value

This graph shows how drastically R-value can be reduced if a project uses standard interface details, while the shape of the curve demonstrates the diminishing returns of increasing the opaque wall R-value.

Credit: Morrison Hershfield Ltd
Designers routinely underestimate total heat flow through their wall assemblies by 20% to 70%, according to a new report prepared by the engineering firm Morrison Hershfield and sponsored by several other Canada-based partners. The good news? Tweaking envelope details may be more effective than adding another inch of insulation.

That’s because adding insulation doesn’t do a lot of good if thermal bridging allows heat to flow right through the assembly. “Building Envelope Thermal Bridging Guide – Analysis, Applications, and Insights” aims to help practitioners reduce thermal bridging with guidance on how to calculate the R-value of an entire assembly, accounting for the thermal performance of each part.

Details like small, cross-sectional areas of shelf angles, or flashing around windows, not only degrade assembly performance but also increase the risk of condensation (see The Hidden Science of High-Performance Building Assemblies). The guide catalogues the thermal performance of some common wall, floor, and balcony slab assemblies, glazing transitions, and parapets for easy comparison, and provides the material data used to calculate the performance of those details.

Construction cost estimates are also included, showing, for example, that a thermally broken concrete balcony can cost $266 more per meter, or $81 more per foot, compared to a continuous concrete balcony. However, “Even some expensive options look attractive when compared to the cost-effectiveness of adding insulation,” argues the report. A case study included in the appendix finds that, although upgrading to thermally broken balconies and parapets for a high-rise multi-unit residential building with 40% glazing would initially cost more than increasing the effective wall assembly R-value from R-15 to R-20, the payback period would be more than seven times shorter.

Published September 23, 2014 Permalink

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a BuildingGreen Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

Comments

April 1, 2015 - 10:59 am

The high cost of a thermally broken balcony assumes the balcony to be a concrete cantilever, but that is not necessary.  Balconies can be prefab and hung on the facade.  Thus, they could be lighter and fully assembled at the factory with their railings already attached.  There are many such examples in Chicago where existing buildings had balconies added to them.  Such a balcony system could well be less expensive than the normal non-thermally cantilever concrete balcony.  Such balconies can also look better, if a cantilever concrete balcony is not the aesthetic standard.